nanog mailing list archives
Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law.
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:28:51 +1100
Could be considered off-topic because it is humor.I guess a lot of US network operators are going to have to change their DNS entries because apparently the rDNS policies are now set by federal law.....
http://www.au.sorbs.net/~matthew/funny/rDNS-set-by-federal-law.txt Regards, Mat
Current thread:
- Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 16)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Peter Corlett (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Rich Kulawiec (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Tony Finch (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Matthew Sullivan (Mar 17)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. Steve Sobol (Mar 15)
- Re: Possibly OT, definately humor. rDNS is to policy set by federal law. S. Ryan (Mar 15)