nanog mailing list archives
Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years?
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:03:14 -0400
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:31:51 +0000 (GMT) "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Paul Ferguson wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com> wrote:On 6/29/07, Rich Emmings <rich () nic umass edu> wrote:Topicality: Looks like someone, somewhere intends to be live with IPv6 in 3-5 years. Off Topic: The privacy and security ramifications boggle the mind....Fully mobile, high speed botnets?*bing*I can't help it: "If a bot-car is headed north on I-75 at 73 miles per hour for 3 hours and a bot-truck is headed west on I-90 at 67 miles per hour, how long until they are 129 miles apart?"
Hmm -- I was going to say 127.1 miles apart, but that's not a v6 address... 1918 miles apart? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Rich Emmings (Jun 28)
- Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Paul Ferguson (Jun 28)
- Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Chris L. Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 28)
- Re: An IPv6 address for new cars in 3 years? Chris L. Morrow (Jun 28)