nanog mailing list archives
Re: trans-Atlantic latency?
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:51:47 +0200
On 29-jun-2007, at 1:20, Neal R wrote:
What is a reasonable latency to see on a link of that distance?
You'll want to ask whether this is one-way latency or round trip time. I'm seeing this from Amsterdam:6 51.ae0.cr2.iad1.us.scnet.net (216.246.102.94) 82.686 ms 82.762 ms 82.808 ms 7 15.xe-1-2-0.cr1.ord1.us.scnet.net (216.246.36.246) 100.792 ms 100.830 ms 100.798 ms 8 v53.ar2.ord1.us.scnet.net (216.246.95.138) 101.051 ms 101.087 ms 101.042 ms 9 v223.aggr223.ord1.us.scnet.net (216.246.94.30) 101.301 ms 101.318 ms 101.423 ms
I don't think you're going to do significantly better than this, I'd be amazed if anyone can do London - Chicago below 90 ms round trip.
Current thread:
- trans-Atlantic latency? Neal R (Jun 28)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 28)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 28)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Jay Hennigan (Jun 28)
- RE: trans-Atlantic latency? Security Admin (NetSec) (Jun 28)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Leigh Porter (Jun 29)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Peter Dambier (Jun 29)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Andy Ashley (Jun 29)
- Re: trans-Atlantic latency? Jim Segrave (Jun 29)
- RE: trans-Atlantic latency? Brian Knoll (TTNET) (Jun 29)