Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

["randal k" <nanog () data102 com>]

On 6/14/07, Olsen, Jason <jolsen () devry com> wrote:
> Neither one of these seems well-equipped to deal with "virtual"
> interfaces such as an ethernet interface that is VRRP or HSRP'd between
> two routers (eg x.x.x.10 is your "virtual" IP for the subnet's gateway,
> router 1 has physical interface IP of x.x.x.8 and router 2 has x.x.x.9).


This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue
of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in
my opinion, very necessary.

randal