Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered to read the article..

[David Freedman <david.freedman () uk clara net>]

Its too late, you've already admitted that the data exists and can be 
captured.

This is always where it starts...

Dave.


Leigh Porter wrote:
> Alexander Harrowell wrote:
>
> > On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
> > > all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
> > > of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
> > > what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
> > > the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
> > > and get it all from that.
> > >
> > > For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
> > > get a few hits on it.
> >
> > Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
> > the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
> > you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
> > you're with the terrorists.
>
>
> I actually removed the code in Squid that logs so it's impossible to log 
> without significant development work ;-)
>
> --
> Leigh Porter