nanog mailing list archives
Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:23:02 -0400
On 7-Jun-2007, at 02:48, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Speaking of FUD... NAT does nothing here that is not also accomplished#1 NAT advantage: it protects consumers from vendor lock-in.through the use of PI addressing.True, diy PI (mmm, PI) is a major reason people use it for v4 and why they'll want something similar for v6. No internal renumbering, ever. I can see why they choose it, even with the disadvantages PI for everyone?
LISP! :-)
Current thread:
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Roger Marquis (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Matthew Palmer (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Owen DeLong (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Jo Rhett (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Jo Rhett (Jun 28)
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Jo Rhett (Jun 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Brandon Butterworth (Jun 06)
- Re: Security gain from NAT: Top 5 Joe Abley (Jun 07)