Re: ULA BoF

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

[ i do not see mail from the respondent.  and this reminds me why ]

> > > we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
> > > the virtues of ula central at the bof.
> > How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks about
> > address space that's never used on the internet relevant?
> 1) He never specified that the operator had to operate an _ISP_ network.

in the words of klaus wirth "i did not run out of ink."

> 2) Even ISP networks have infrastructure which they might not want routed
>    on the public Internet.

in fact, the intro speaker is a pro and a carrier.  but i don't want to
overload them.

i wonder what the O in nanOg stands for?

randy