nanog mailing list archives

RE: TCP congestion

From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:44:57 +0100

Who knows, maybe a few packets got corrupted on the wire, and 
the TCP chucksum actually caught it and dropped the offending packets.


Or there could be flags in the bitstream...

--Michael Dillon

Current thread:

TCP congestion Philip Lavine (Jul 12)
- RE: TCP congestion Brian Knoll (TTNET) (Jul 12)
  - Re: TCP congestion Fred Baker (Jul 12)
- Re: TCP congestion Jared Mauch (Jul 12)
- Re: TCP congestion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 12)
  - RE: TCP congestion michael.dillon (Jul 12)
- Re: TCP congestion Joe Loiacono (Jul 12)
- Re: TCP congestion Jay Hennigan (Jul 12)
  - Re: TCP congestion Warren Kumari (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TCP congestion Philip Lavine (Jul 12)
  - Re: TCP congestion Stephen Wilcox (Jul 12)
- Re: TCP congestion Philip Lavine (Jul 12)
  - RE: TCP congestion Brian Knoll (TTNET) (Jul 12)
  - Re: TCP congestion Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 12)
    - Re: TCP congestion Stephen Wilcox (Jul 12)
    - Re: TCP congestion Kevin Loch (Jul 12)

(Thread continues...)