nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6


From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:29:57 +0200


Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Randy is right.  It's very simple from 30,000 feet; it's a lot messier
in detail if done at scale.  I'll give just example, using your
suggestion of converting DMZ: how do you keep your firewall rules
consistent between v4 and v6 addresses and prefixes?

We actually cover some of this ground in RFC 4192, which talks about v6 renumbering. Also not fun, but v4 is somewhat less fun. This having been said, and as Simon has noted in a later message, you need to abstract addresses to make all of this stuff work smoothly. That has to happen both in the network management tools and within the operating system. I know that scares the hell out of some people but there is a high price being paid for not doing it.

Eliot


Current thread: