nanog mailing list archives

Re: Google wants to be your Internet


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:29:57 -0800



On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:48 AM, <michael.dillon () bt com> wrote:

The whole address conservation mantra has turned out to be a lot
of smoke and mirrors anyway.

At the time, yes, this particular issue was overhyped, just as the routing-table-expansion issue was underhyped. As we move to an 'Internet of Things', however, it will become manifestl

With regards to the perceived advantages and disadvantages of IPv6 as it is currently defined, there is wide range of opinion on the subject. For many, the 'still-need-NAT-under-IPv6 vs. IPv6- eliminates-the-need-for-NAT' debate is of minor importance compared to more fundamental questions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice

                    Technology is legislation.

                        -- Karl Schroeder





Current thread: