nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers
From: Douglas Otis <dotis () mail-abuse org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:45:29 -0800
On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:27 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Alexander Harrowell wrote:It was clear from the highly reliable index I call the "Nanogdex" that nothing was seriously amiss.Yes, but it got so much bloody press that ambitious copycats can't be too far behind.
When 2 of 13 root systems are affected (>90% loss), how many systems will withstand such an attack when targeted lower within the hierarchy? FWIW, the attack rates did not seem that high.
-Doug
Current thread:
- Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Roy (Feb 06)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Rob Thomas (Feb 06)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Alexander Harrowell (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Jeff Kell (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Douglas Otis (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers virendra rode // (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Joe Abley (Feb 08)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Alexander Harrowell (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Rob Thomas (Feb 06)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Aaron Glenn (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 07)
- Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers Hank Zannini (Feb 07)
- RE: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Stasiniewicz, Adam (Feb 10)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Alexander Harrowell (Feb 11)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Adrian Chadd (Feb 11)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Rich Kulawiec (Feb 12)