nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCC on wifi at hotel


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:49:53 -0500


On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:35:43PM -0600, Carl Karsten wrote:

me again.

So wifi at pycon 07 was 'better than 06' witch I hear was a complete 
disaster. More on 07's coming soon.

Now we are talking about wifi at pycon 08, which will be at a different 
hotel (Crown Plaza in Rosemont, IL) and the question came up: Can the hotel 
actively prevent us from using our own wifi?

_maney: although - wasn't the hotel stuck on "our wifi or no wifi" at last 
report?

CarlFK: only the FCC can restrict radio

tpollari: it's their network and their power the FCC has no legal right to 
that. and no, you show me where they do.  I'm not wasting my day with that 
tripe -- the caselaw you're likely thinking of has to do with an airline 
and an airport and the airline's lounge, in which case they're paying for 
the power and paying for their bandwidth from a provider that's not the 
airport. We're not.

I know that there are all sorts of factors, and just cuz the FCC says boo 
isn't the end of the story, but i don't even know what the FCC's position 
on this is. google gave me many hits, and after looking at 10 or so I 
 decided to look elsewhere.

        I suggest you google for massport fcc and continental.

        - jared


-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: