nanog mailing list archives

Re: botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:10:44 GMT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey, Danny:

- -- Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net> wrote:

While I understand your frustration, lest we not forget, providers  
are in
the business of making money, and solutions of this type today only add
to churn, additional operational expense and liability.  It's not  
quite so
black and white as you make it, unfortunately.

Unfortunately, if ISPs don't do _something_ to "clean up their
own backyards", I hate to think of what the alternative may be.

With that, as Sean points out, providers are trying to address the  
issues
in an business-savvy manner and some do seem to have reasonable (IMO)
solutions underway.  But be careful what you ask for, some of these
solutions you're mandating might very well resemble SiteFinder-style
schema's (or far worse) in order to justify the investment by the  
providers.

Indeed.

It's a hairy problem, but an important one that needs to be
addressed.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFF16eOq1pz9mNUZTMRAhNYAKCSmQieIM8K44H4AnRWcWbXVwax8wCglsF6
BMb6JC95v5IrtIH2x+MYMw0=
=T5dQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: