Re: botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf

[Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Petri Helenius wrote:
> > After all these years, I'm still surprised a consortium of ISP's haven't 
> > figured out a way to do something a-la Packet Fence for their clients where 
> > - whenever an infected machine is detected after logging in, that machine 
> > is thrown into say a VLAN with instructions on how to clean their machines 
> > before they're allowed to go further and stay online.
> This has been commercially available for quite some time so it would be only 
> up to the providers to implement it.

Public ISPs have been testing these types of systems for over 5 years. 
What sorts of differences can you think of that would explain why public
ISPs have found them not very effective?

Public ISPs have been using walled gardens for a long time for user 
registration and collecting credit card information.  So they know how to
implement walled gardens.  But what happens when public ISPs use it for 
infected machines?