nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe?
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:12:02 -0500
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:01 +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
the rest of the article is equally horrific in its maltreatment and ignorance of facts.
It's an article in a CxO type magazine.... did anyone really expect anything better? -Jim P.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- DNS: Definitely Not Safe? MARLON BORBA (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Peter Dambier (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Paul Vixie (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Jim Popovitch (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Paul Vixie (Feb 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? MARLON BORBA (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Joe Abley (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 15)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Chris L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? bmanning (Feb 14)
- Re: DNS: Definitely Not Safe? Scott Weeks (Feb 14)