nanog mailing list archives
Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet
From: Albert Meyer <from_nanog () corenap com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:05:44 -0600
I'm not from AT&T, but that page contains three errors and three "What to do" sections. The section referring to RFC 2317 is for DNS errors:
“550 Error. Blocked for status: <unknown sender>”: This error indicates that no identifying information has been entered into the DNS (Domain Name System) for this sending system. The AT&T Worldnet mail system, like many others, does not accept messages from mail systems with no DNS records.
The "Spam complaint" section has a different "What to do:"What to do: Ask the administrator of your mail system to contact us through our System Administrators' page and provide the information we need to investigate the problem.
Paul Vixie wrote: > What to do: Ask your system administrator to submit identifying information > to the DNS. For more information, your administrator should refer to > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2317.html In the meantime, you should use a > fully registered domain for sending your messages, such as the mail system > from an ISP or one of the major free e-mail services. > > now, i count myself as a master of the obscure reference, but this is over > the top. can someone from at&t worldnet please contact me for the purpose > of explaining what RFC 2317 could possibly have to do with spam complaints?
Current thread:
- the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Paul Vixie (Feb 01)
- Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Albert Meyer (Feb 01)
- Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet Al Iverson (Feb 01)