nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 Addressing Plans
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:56:19 -0000
-Do not assign from PoP aggregatesWhat do you mean with the above? If I understand the line correctly, then I disagree with it.
I don't mean anything by that, I just quoted it from the wiki page. If you disgree then you should add something to the page. I have a vague memory that this advice was given in a NANOG presentation on IPv6 but it would not surprise me if it was a case where one size does not fit all. PoP aggregates sounds like a good idea to me, but given the need to meet a certain HD ratio in order to get a larger RIR allocation, it might be risky for an ISP to do that. This is one area where the operator environment differs from the enterprise. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- IPv6 Addressing Plans michael.dillon (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Plans Jeroen Massar (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6 Addressing Plans michael.dillon (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Plans Mark Smith (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6 Addressing Plans michael.dillon (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6 Addressing Plans Jeroen Massar (Dec 27)