nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers


From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:28:36 GMT


I thought we were all trying to discourage NAT in IPv6.  Clearly, NAT
solves the problem ... while introducing 1000 new ones.  :-/

Clearly some have been trying to discourage NAT in IPv6
ensuring there'll be a 1000 problems if anyone tries.

I mean, yeah, it'd be great if we could mandate /48 ...  but I just can't
see it as likely to happen.

If people are supposed to have a /48 then the allocation rules
should say that's what they will get.

It may be xmas but it's not wise to rely on the benevolence of ISPs

brandon


Current thread: