nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent latency / congestion


From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:47:39 -0700

Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:25:12 +0100
From: "Rod Beck" <Rod.Beck () hiberniaatlantic com>
Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu

As opposed to 'unintentionally sabotaged'? I think there is some
redundancy there ...

Sorry for the cheap shot, it was just too tempting. 

Roderick S. Beck
Director of EMEA Sales
Hibernia Atlantic
1, Passage du Chantier, 75012 Paris
http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com
Wireless: 1-212-444-8829. 
Landline: 33-1-4346-3209
AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth
rod.beck () hiberniaatlantic com
rodbeck () erols com
``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.''
Albert Einstein.

If someone sabotages a rail to stop a train and the derailment takes out
the fiber that is buried in the right-of-way, is that unintentional
sabotage? At least of the fiber?

Just asking...;-}
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman () es net                       Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: