nanog mailing list archives
Re: nanog list bad sub
From: Bill Nash <billn () billn net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:38:14 -0700 (MST)
So why send it back to the list at large, committing an arguably worse crime against humanity than the owner of a misfunctioning vacation responder? Is there a pipe on the Smug-o-tron or something? Perhaps you could set it aside, for all our sakes? - billn On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
the following post should not have come to me
Current thread:
- nanog list bad sub Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: nanog list bad sub Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: nanog list bad sub Bill Nash (Aug 16)