nanog mailing list archives

Re: nanog list bad sub


From: Bill Nash <billn () billn net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:38:14 -0700 (MST)



So why send it back to the list at large, committing an arguably worse 
crime against humanity than the owner of a misfunctioning vacation 
responder?

Is there a pipe on the Smug-o-tron or something? Perhaps you could set it 
aside, for all our sakes?

- billn

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Randy Bush wrote:

the following post should not have come to me




Current thread: