Re: ONS - The few the proud ... the sleeping

[Jason LeBlanc <jml () packetpimp org>]

If anyone is running a large enough network that they can't mitigate 
this it would suprise me, and they would deserve to be taken out.  
Unless all these bots are directly connected (direct customer) and 
concentrated on one portion of the network (not spread across the entire 
access layer) I can't imagine with the tools, features, products, etc 
that are available today (that can almost manage dDoS attacks for you) 
that it couldn't be mitigated.  5-6 years ago this would have been a lot 
tougher, but it was still doable. 

It would be interesting to get into a really technical architectural 
discussion.  I have my ideas as to how to manage it, I'm sure others do 
as well, and differently.  And ASN701 as mentioned specifically has 
someone who was able to manage these things 5-6 years ago in Chris 
Morrow (assuming you're still there).  He helped us quite a bit back in 
those days, and without all the toys that are out there today.

J. Oquendo wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
>
>   
> > I doubt if anybody would notice a DDoS attack against MAE-East. ;)
> >     
>
> Who was it that doubted anyone would need more then 1024k of memory?
>
>   
> > 1) You need a pretty big hose, or a *lot* of computers to do it.
> >     
>
> I would hope some have been reading news reports where its alleged this
> particular botnet is over 1.7 million machines deep.
>
>
>   
> > 2a) The ankle-biters don't hose down backbones because (1) they don't usually
> > even know what a backbone is, and (2) they're usually too busy pointing their
> > DDoS tools at some other ankle-biter or IRC admin that cheesed them off.  Yes,
> > these guys have taken out a few mid-tiers, but it's accidental collateral
> > damage, not the intended target.
> >     
>
> Come on now surely you don't believe this to be the only cases where
> idiots us botnets. Have you not read the reports of morons hosing a
> network for randsom.
>
>   
> > 2b) The pros don't hose down backbones, because if a backbone is down, they
> > can't make money from their now-disconnected botnet.
> >     
>
> Re-read above statement
>
>   
> > Yeah, a concerted effort probably *would* take out AS701 or similar.  But we
> > don't see it happen often, because the people who have the ability to do it
> > also realize that while AS701 is out napping, their other business ventures
> > are taking a hit from the lost connectivity...
> >     
>
> For years now I contemplated how long would it be before someone created
> the ultimate botnet/backbone killer. I've always wondered "Hrmm... How
> would I COUNTER this if x happened." I've rambled on about it for I
> don't know 8 years now, starting with "Theories in DoS" before DDoS was
> really even pimped out by Dave Dittrich... People thought (probably
> still do think) I was (am) looney. My guess is, give or take a few years
> and you will get that one pissed off person to lay the smack down on
> peers worldwide.
>
> When this happens (hopefully it won't), I'll sit back and ramble on some
> more with "that's so yesterday... I predicted it a "real long time ago"
> (www.infiltrated.net/chappelle.mp3) then go back to rambling on as I
> always do.
>
>
>