RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T?

["Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Michael Airhart <mairhart () cisco com> wrote:

> I can't speak for Cisco or Cisco IT, but as evidenced by this email, 
at least part of our connectivity is up.
> No doubt someone official is looking at it as we speak.  (I'll just 
lurk Nanog to get the skinny)..
>

Cisco's problem seems to be have been resolved.

Also see:

 http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/08/update_ciscocom_site.html

Thanks to everyone for their verification. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014)

wj8DBQFGujLsq1pz9mNUZTMRAu7pAJ4s2GtvR24DNGyLwGmEeaz6sLQx7gCfZW/J
ALFp5DbrxnvdxL9Qfl8OyHk=
=0gF2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/