nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:51:19 GMT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net> wrote:

On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Fergie wrote:

Please read what I wrote:

"I would think that it's actually very easy to do when
sub-allocations are SWIP'ed."

I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are
not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-)

And how do you know the difference?  The Cox IP address is SWIPed.   
Its even sub-allocated.  The allocation is just a /19.


Again, a simple recursive WHOIS will show you sub-allocations if they
are properly SWIP'ed.

Not a big deal, really.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGGFiiq1pz9mNUZTMRArfSAJ9X5CMo0M+Tg0Tf1vN2UWytF3oB8gCg/TEH
fP3GwH7aW3J7DeNpH3m/aeY=
=VQ9W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: