nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:51:19 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net> wrote:
On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Fergie wrote:Please read what I wrote: "I would think that it's actually very easy to do when sub-allocations are SWIP'ed." I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-)And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed.
Its even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19.
Again, a simple recursive WHOIS will show you sub-allocations if they are properly SWIP'ed. Not a big deal, really. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214) wj8DBQFGGFiiq1pz9mNUZTMRArfSAJ9X5CMo0M+Tg0Tf1vN2UWytF3oB8gCg/TEH fP3GwH7aW3J7DeNpH3m/aeY= =VQ9W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Joel Jaeggli (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks John R Levine (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Pete Templin (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks John L (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Pete Templin (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 09)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks michael.dillon (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Joseph S D Yao (Apr 10)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Stephen Satchell (Apr 10)