nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spain was offline
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () renesys com>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:26:45 -0400
At 06:05 AM 9/4/2006, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
On 01.09 13:47, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > I can't get a TLD zone? But back to the root servers. Are you > agreering with me that if I announce F and I root's netblocks > inside of my own network that everyone would be ok with that? > > C'mon Joe, straight answer on that one. :) Straight answer: No. Exercises: Who is responsible if this set-up fails? Who is responsible if it lies? Who is likely to get blamed for any failures?
The burden is already on the provider. The providers answer the call when these things break or perform badly.
Would this require explicit consent from all customers subject to such treatment?
I don't think so. There's no guarantee that an internal route facing a customer is "RIPE K ROOT". Peers may feel differently, but I wouldn't advocate exporting (unless they did and perhaps would pay me for better access to the application). That's different. [ snip ] -M< (thanks for operating K, it is one of the better ones from my measurements but that's part of the problem now isn't it? Consistency in some areas.) -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574 Member of Technical Staff Network Operationshannigan () renesys com
Current thread:
- Re: Spain was offline, (continued)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Keith Mitchell (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Joe Abley (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 01)
- Re: Spain was offline Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline Michael . Dillon (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline steve (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 04)
- Re: Spain was offline Martin Hannigan (Sep 04)