nanog mailing list archives
RE: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback?
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:52 +0100
Even if you assume that allocations made by ARIN are not property,
it's
hard to argue that pre-ARIN allocations are not. They're not subject to revocation and their grant wasn't conditioned on compliance with
policies. The reason that ARIN allocations are not property is that pre-ARIN allocations were not property. ARIN is merely continuing the former process with more structure and public oversight. Are telephone numbers property? In any case, since the conditions of the pre-ARIN allocations were all informal, unrecorded and largely verbal, nobody can prove that there was any kind of irrevocable grant. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Mark Kent (Sep 08)
- RE: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? David Schwartz (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Niels Bakker (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Jack Bates (Sep 08)
- Tragedy of the Commons; was Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Travis Hassloch (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Joseph S D Yao (Sep 08)
- RE: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Michael . Dillon (Sep 11)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Niels Bakker (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? joe mcguckin (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? Mark Kent (Sep 08)
- Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? william(at)elan.net (Sep 08)
- RE: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback? David Schwartz (Sep 08)