nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns - golog
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:43:49 -0400
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:50:37 +0200, Luke Besson said:
Can you suggest me any objective reason in order to invalidate this proposal?
Others have pointed out that wildcarding *might* work when done to consenting HTTP traffic. It certainly doesn't work very well if applied to non-consenting HTTP, or non-HTTP. On the other hand, if your policy-makers want to get a piece of the big revenue stream and positive PR that Verisign and Earthlink got when they deployed similar schemes, there isn't much I can do other than channel Randy Bush at you....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- dns - golog Luke Besson (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Simon Waters (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Niels Bakker (Oct 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: dns - golog Rod Ed (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Thomas Leavitt (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Simon Waters (Oct 20)
- Re: dns - golog Thomas Leavitt (Oct 19)
- Re: dns - golog Martin Hannigan (Oct 21)