nanog mailing list archives
Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: Douglas Otis <dotis () mail-abuse org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:11:54 -0700
On Oct 11, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:54:03 BST, Per Gregers Bilse said:The problem is that from and including A we can't talk about the damned things any more -- we resort to spelling out each number, with no inherent and natural feel for what we're talking about.An A380 has a maximum take-off weight of around 24E (two-four-E) tonnes. An A380 has a maximum take-off weight of around 590 (five hundred and ninety) tonnes.I've seen somebody pronounce C48C as 'ceety four hundred and eighty cee' - and the person listening grokked it. aety, beety, ceety, deety, eety, effty. aety and eighty are a bit too similar, unfortunately.
There is also a convention defined at- 'x' prefix/suffix convention for pronouncing hexadecimal numbers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal -Doug
Current thread:
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..., (continued)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Edward Lewis (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... shields (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Per Gregers Bilse (Oct 10)
- 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Geoff Huston (Oct 10)
- Re: 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Hank Nussbacher (Oct 11)
- Re: 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Geoff Huston (Oct 11)
- 4-Byte ASNs from the perspective of the 2-Byte world Geoff Huston (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Ian Mason (Oct 11)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 11)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Douglas Otis (Oct 11)