nanog mailing list archives
RE: Verizon PSTN continued
From: "Wallace Keith" <kwallace () pcconnection com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:40:44 -0500
Working with 2 other carriers on a similar issue, response I rec'd was congestion due to automated political dialers. Not sure if I believe that or not... -Keith -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of David Hubbard Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:32 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Verizon PSTN continued The thread yesterday didn't seem to get into much detail; I'm wondering if anyone knows more about what is going on with Verizon? Our PSTN service with XO seems to be affected again by what XO claims is a Verizon problem but they wouldn't elaborate on why they feel that to be the case; I was just amazed to even get someone on the phone at XO since normally they are unreachable. I am inclined to partially believe them since I've found other numbers that I know to be with other carriers that are not working. XO claimed this was at least a regional issue of Verizon's that is affecting multiple carriers. David
Current thread:
- Verizon PSTN continued David Hubbard (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Jared Mauch (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Steve Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Greg Boehnlein (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Thomas Beecher (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Wallace Keith (Nov 07)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Chris L. Morrow (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued virendra rode // (Nov 07)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Sean Donelan (Nov 09)
- SprintLink peering issue in Chicago? Olsen, Jason (Nov 09)
- Re: SprintLink peering issue in Chicago? Matthew Petach (Nov 09)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Alexander Harrowell (Nov 10)
- RE: Verizon PSTN continued Chris L. Morrow (Nov 07)
- Re: Verizon PSTN continued Jared Mauch (Nov 07)