nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers
From: Alexander Koch <efraim () clues de>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:50:36 +0100
On Sun, 19 November 2006 17:31:36 -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote: [max-prefix]
We use it facing customers, typically set to about double the number of prefixes that we expect to see from them, configured to restart in 10 minutes. This is a sanity check should they try to send us a full table or similar broken behavior. Route-maps and filter-lists are in place as well.
ehm, when you have filter lists, why max-prefix? do you really use filters, if so what kind of? i would be really curious to know what other ISPs do. the more 'content' an ISP is the more crazy the announcements get unfortunately, which is a shame. how do you filter that? /18 le 24 and just let go? Alexander
Current thread:
- "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Ricardo V. Oliveira (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Joe Abley (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Daniele Arena (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Niels Bakker (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jeff Aitken (Nov 20)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Alexander Koch (Nov 19)
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Neighbor maximum-prefix" option on routers Scott Weeks (Nov 19)