nanog mailing list archives

RE: The Cidr Report


From: "Scott Morris" <swm () emanon com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:17:29 -0500


It sounds like government work!  When something doesn't work, they just make
numbers up!  (Just be sure to create more plausible numbers next time!
(smirk))

Scott
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Geoff Huston
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:15 PM
To: Fergie; simon () limmat switch ch
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report


When my zebra BGP daemin looses its grip on life and dies a horrible death
the rest to the scripts wander into a strange twilight zone and make up
numbers

sorry

(I really need to code more defensively for this type of condition!)

   geoff

At 04:56 AM 11/11/2006, Fergie wrote:

Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-)

Date              Prefixes        CIDR Aggregated
04-11-06          199323          129829
05-11-06          199330          129854
06-11-06          199273          129854
07-11-06          -1077937252     129854
08-11-06          -1077936760     129854
09-11-06          672037797       129854
10-11-06          -1077937324     129854
11-11-06          134555024       129854

- ferg



-- Simon Leinen <simon () limmat switch ch> wrote:

cidr-report  writes:
Recent Table History
        Date      Prefixes    CIDR Agg
        03-11-06    199409      129843
[...]
        10-11-06  134555024      129854

Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week!
(But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the 
IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR 
Report software has an R200K problem?
--
Simon.



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/




Current thread: