nanog mailing list archives
Re: odd hijack
From: Nick Feamster <feamster () cc gatech edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:51:34 -0500
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:55:40AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
Wouldn't they want to hijack more specifics to spam?no. see nick feamster's work, and the lightning talk i proxied for him in dallas.
Here are the links from our observations on this, from our Feb NANOG talk: http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/nick-feamster.pdf and our SIGCOMM paper: http://sigcomm06.stanford.edu/discussion/showpaper.php?paper_id=28%22 Cheers, Nick
Current thread:
- odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack steve (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Nick Feamster (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Josh Karlin (Nov 09)
- Re: odd hijack Nick Feamster (Nov 10)
- Re: odd hijack Hank Nussbacher (Nov 09)