nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics
From: Peter Dambier <peter () peter-dambier de>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:55:33 +0200
Christian Kuhtz wrote:
On May 24, 2006, at 9:44 AM, sthaug () nethelp no wrote:I see a list of documents. I see no sign that these documents are standards, nor that they are actually *implemented*. I know for a fact that the service provider I work for has not implemented this on the IP side.
French and german ISPs keep complaining about what it has cost them and they keep informing us (customers) that it is on us to pay the bill. I remember one german ISP who was helpful enough to mention the cost for spying in his bill. It was a mistake and the money was refunded ... Whenever mailservers are down here in germany somebody mentions the delay is because all email is routed via the german gouvernement again :)
Now, now, Steinar, we all know that cannot be true. Case and point, everyone has implemented RFC 3514, just because it has been published as a standard.;-) Best regards, Christian
I just tested my NAT-router and made shure it is RFC 3514 compliant. Yes the NASTY bit is set :) Cheers Peter and Karin -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Graeffstrasse 14 D-64646 Heppenheim +49(6252)671-788 (Telekom) +49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: peter () peter-dambier de mail: peter () echnaton serveftp com http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
Current thread:
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs], (continued)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Steven M. Bellovin (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 24)