nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier 2 - Lease?
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:46:59 -0400
The tier nomenclature also a really good way to instigate flame fests on lists such as this. Regards Marshall On May 3, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0700, Robert Sherrard wrote:What make a provider a tier 2, versus a tier 1 provider...Marketing. The nomenclature is a completelyy irrelevant hangover of the NSFnet days when people thought in terms of "the backbone". If your providers' value is only in specific delicate contractural relationships that can vanish with little notice, is that really a value? You should examine carriers by your needs, performance, scope, reliability [human and network], cost, etc meaningful metrics. Get reference clients and query their technical staff. Get a view into their routing table and examine adjacenies.... if *you* care about a particular adjacency, press for performace data/trends. Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?), (continued)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Aaron Glenn (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Peter Cohen (May 05)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Michael . Dillon (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Todd Vierling (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) John Dupuy (May 05)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? bmanning (May 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Marshall Eubanks (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Martin Hannigan (May 03)
- Wikipedia watching (was: Tier 2 - Lease?) William Allen Simpson (May 03)