nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier 2 - Lease?
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:30:55 -0400
On May 3, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Todd Underwood wrote:
to underline a point made previously though: Tier-1 is a routing architecture term that doesn't have any useful direct bearing in how best to select a service provider.
s/routing architecture/business/It is possible to be a "Tier Two" provider and use communities & route-maps to look like a Tier One. You purchase transit, therefore are not tier one, but are unreachable through your transit unless the end point is a downstream of your transit provider.
Architecturally, those are identical situations. Different commercial agreements, though.
-- TTFN, patrickP.S. How much you wanna bet some of the "tier ones" are paying other "tier ones" more for fiber or colo or something than the "tier twos".
Current thread:
- Tier 2 - Lease? Robert Sherrard (May 02)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Richard A Steenbergen (May 02)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Robert Sherrard (May 02)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Martin Hannigan (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Todd Underwood (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Michael . Dillon (May 04)
- Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) John Dupuy (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) bmanning (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Jon Lyons (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Martin Hannigan (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Brandon Ross (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Jon Lyons (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Aaron Glenn (May 04)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Peter Cohen (May 05)
- Re: Tier Zero (was Re: Tier 2 - Lease?) Michael . Dillon (May 05)
- Re: Tier 2 - Lease? Richard A Steenbergen (May 02)