nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mutual Redistribution
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:37:48 -0500
Mark Smith wrote:
One better solution is to take advantage of route tags or labels. When a route is redistributed you tag it, and then when mutual redistribution occurs in the other direction, you exclude routes that have that tag. You'd need to do this in both redistribution directions, with different tags to prevent loops in either direction. This method doesn't rely on the behaviour of always increase metrics, so it would be more robust. HTH, Mark.
I dont believe popular vendors implementations of rip propogate tags. At least the last time I tried loop prevention with that, it didnt work.
Current thread:
- Mutual Redistribution Glen Kent (Mar 27)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Mark Smith (Mar 28)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Joe Maimon (Mar 28)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Mark Smith (Mar 29)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Joe Maimon (Mar 29)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Mark Smith (Mar 29)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Joe Maimon (Mar 28)
- Re: Mutual Redistribution Mark Smith (Mar 28)