nanog mailing list archives
Re: Security control in DSL access network
From: William Caban <william.caban () netxar com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:13:07 -0500
An E-Series is not a DSLAM, it's a BRAS. Totally different function. A BRAS terminates subscriber sessions, a DSLAM terminates xDSL lines. Some DSLAMs act as mini BRAS these days. But an E-Series is not a DSLAM.Ooops! Yeah! I don't know what I was thinking when I mixed the two. I've been talking about the BRAS. The DSLAMs that I've worked with, Stingers and Paradyne, none support tens of thousands. Definitively not. Sorry about the mix up.Is this where your confusion is? You really mean to be talking about BRAS?
So for the previous emails: 's/DSLAM/BRAS/g' -W
Current thread:
- Security control in DSL access network Joe Shen (Mar 25)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network William Caban (Mar 27)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Christian Kuhtz (Mar 27)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network William Caban (Mar 27)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Christian Kuhtz (Mar 27)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network William Caban (Mar 28)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network William Caban (Mar 27)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Peter Dambier (Mar 28)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Sean Donelan (Mar 28)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 28)
- Re: Security control in DSL access network Sean Donelan (Mar 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Security control in DSL access network Lasher, Donn (Mar 29)