nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wiltel has gone pink.
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:16:49 -0500
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:22:33 PST, Jo Rhett said:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:25PM -0500, andrew2 () one net wrote:Or perhaps there's a more reasonable explanation like being assimilated with Level3 and perhaps some contact info. is a little stale at this point in the merger process... Never attribute to malfeasance what can be explained by everyday corporate beauracracy.I'm missing the point where I am supposed to care. The regulations concerning proper contact information don't mention this exception. Complete and utter incompetence (ie spam filtering their abuse mailbox) are to blame for mail being rejected, and the phone numbers being out of date are their fault, not a valid excuse.
If anything, it's *easier* to deal with clued providers that have misplaced their moral compass and gone pink, than to deal with mere stupidity. Alas, both types of sites are present in sufficient numbers to overwhelm almost anybody's ability to continue caring....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Wiltel has gone pink. Jo Rhett (Mar 13)
- RE: Wiltel has gone pink. andrew2 (Mar 13)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Jo Rhett (Mar 14)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Simon Lyall (Mar 14)
- RE: Wiltel has gone pink. Frank Bulk (Mar 14)
- RE: Wiltel has gone pink. william(at)elan.net (Mar 14)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Jo Rhett (Mar 14)
- RE: Wiltel has gone pink. andrew2 (Mar 13)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Steve Linford (Mar 16)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Jo Rhett (Mar 16)
- Re: Wiltel has gone pink. Jo Rhett (Mar 14)