nanog mailing list archives
RE: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric.
From: "David Hubbard" <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:37:44 -0500
From: alex () pilosoft com
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:We have heard a lot of negatives about them, about their pricing model, about their network, about de-peering with Level 3, etc. What we really need is actual information.Much of the negatives is from jaded competitors who don't want to fairly compete. Other than that, the answer is 'it depends'.
Depends on if you like to do traffic engineering; Cogent's BGP community support, consisting of a whole three things you can set (two if you only have a single connection to them), makes that rather difficult. David
Current thread:
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric., (continued)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Martin Hannigan (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Todd Underwood (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Matthew Crocker (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Daniel Senie (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Steve Meuse (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Jay Ford (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. James (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Jay Ford (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. James (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Pete Templin (Mar 10)
- RE: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. David Hubbard (Mar 08)
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Charles Gucker (Mar 08)
- RE: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. David Hubbard (Mar 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Honest Cogent opinions without rhetoric. Charles Gucker (Mar 08)
- Message not available