nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]
From: "Per Heldal" <heldal () eml cc>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:28:00 +0100
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:24:59 +0100, "Kurt Erik Lindqvist" <kurtis () kurtis pp se> said: [snip]
Ok, so shim6 doesn't require a change to the transport layer and it doesn't change the forwarding plane. It does create a mapping state at the end-nodes. So claiming it to be either is probably wrong.
I stand corrected. Was commenting from a flawed perspective. The most correct is probably to consider it a sub-layer to the existing L3. //per -- Per Heldal http://heldal.eml.cc/
Current thread:
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing], (continued)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Roland Dobbins (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Marshall Eubanks (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 03)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Stephen Sprunk (Mar 03)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Edward B. DREGER (Mar 02)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 04)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Per Heldal (Mar 06)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Mar 06)
- Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing] Per Heldal (Mar 07)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jeroen Massar (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jeroen Massar (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Mark Newton (Mar 02)
- Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) william(at)elan.net (Mar 02)
- Re: Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 02)
- Re: Notes on design of IPv6 BGP multihoming with special subroute attributes (was - Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing) william(at)elan.net (Mar 02)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Jared Mauch (Mar 01)
- Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing Owen DeLong (Mar 01)