nanog mailing list archives

Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:13:27 +0100


Stephen Sprunk wrote:

Shim6 is an answer to "what kind of multihoming can we offer to sites
without PI space?"; it is yet to be seen if anyone cares about the
answer to that question.

This argument is circular.  The only real way to test demand is to offer
a service and see if customers bite.

Eliot

Current thread:

Re: shim6 @ NANOG, (continued)
- - - Re: shim6 @ NANOG David Meyer (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
    - Time for IPv8? (was Re: shim6 @ NANOG) Roland Dobbins (Mar 05)
    - Time for IPv10? (was Re: Time for IPv8?) Roland Dobbins (Mar 05)
    - Re: Time for IPv10? (was Re: Time for IPv8?) bmanning (Mar 05)
    - Re: Time for IPv8? (was Re: shim6 @ NANOG) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 05)
    - Re: Time for IPv8? (was Re: shim6 @ NANOG) william(at)elan.net (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG Per Heldal (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG Michael . Dillon (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Randy Bush (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Eliot Lear (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Stephen Sprunk (Mar 06)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Eliot Lear (Mar 06)
  - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Michael . Dillon (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) David Barak (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Edward B. DREGER (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Daniel Golding (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Gustavo Lozano (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Michael . Dillon (Mar 03)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kevin Day (Mar 02)
    - Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Michael . Dillon (Mar 02)

(Thread continues...)