nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tor and network security/administration
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel () mamane lu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:21:57 +0200
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:53:06PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
If the point of the technology is to add a degree of anonymity, you can be pretty sure that a marker expressly designed to state the message "Hi, I'm anonymous!" will never be a standard feature of said technology. That's a pretty obvious non-starter.
Which begs the original question of this thread which I started: with that said, how exactly does one filter this technology?
The list of IP addresses of tor nodes is *public*. If tor users can get it, you can, too. Some IRC networks already run a stripped-down tor client to always tag connections from tor as such, and permit channel operators to ban such connections from their channel should they wish so. -- Lionel
Current thread:
- Re: Tor and network security/administration, (continued)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Kevin Day (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Jeremy Chadwick (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Steve Atkins (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Matthew Sullivan (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 22)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Matthew Sullivan (Jun 22)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 22)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Jeremy Chadwick (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 22)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Jun 17)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration John Payne (Jun 17)