nanog mailing list archives
Tor and network security/administration
From: Jeremy Chadwick <nanog () jdc parodius com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:29:02 -0700
Apologies if this has been brought up before. Being as I'm not a network administrator myself (although I do filter some stuff using pf and ipfw on my severs), I'm curious what NAs think of the following technology: http://tor.eff.org/overview.html.en The problem I see is that this technology will be used (literally, not ideally) solely for harassment (especially via IRC). I do not see any other practical use for this technology other than that. The whole "right to privacy/anonymity" argument is legitimate, but I do not see people using* Tor for legitimate purposes. A colleague of mine stated his opinion of my opinion: "Your problem with Tor is that you can't control it, isn't it?" And he's right -- that's the exact problem I have with it. Comments/concerns? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Current thread:
- Tor and network security/administration Jeremy Chadwick (Jun 17)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Kevin Day (Jun 17)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 18)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 19)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 20)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Kevin Day (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Kevin Day (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Lionel Elie Mamane (Jun 18)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Todd Vierling (Jun 21)
- Re: Tor and network security/administration Kevin Day (Jun 17)