nanog mailing list archives

Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular.


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:23:15 +0000 (GMT)



On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

That was not my advice btw - just forwarding on what I saw.


oh,. apologies, i did cut the message down quite a bit :( I understood you
were quoting from the spamdiaries website, I apologize to the other
listeners (readers?) if it confused the issue.

What you say does seem like a "must do" all right - but putting ARP
filters in is actually a reasonable idea.


Atleast it'd trim down the 'problem' to the single customer subnet, I
assume that dedicated hosting folks don't just drop machines behind a
switch on one big flat subnet? That's probably a naive assumption though
:(  Perhaps this is clue #12 that that is a 'less than good' option? :)

On 6/14/06, Christopher L. Morrow
<christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/2006/02/new-host-cloaking-technique-used-by.html

    * Monitor your local network for interfaces transmitting ARP
responses they shouldn't be.

how about just mac security on switch ports? limit the number of mac's at
each port to 1 or some number 'valid' ?



--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)



Current thread: