nanog mailing list archives

RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel...


From: "Joseph Jackson" <JJackson () aninetworks com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:57:12 -0700


I agree.  I think this isn't a bad service.  If people want to run it
more power to them.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Golding [mailto:dgolding () tier1research com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:22 PM
To: 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'; 'Steve Sobol'
Cc: Joseph Jackson; nanog () nanog org
Subject: RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel...


That's absolutely ridiculous. Enterprise IT organizations 
make decisions on behalf of their userbase all day. Frankly, 
I'd be shocked if many tried this out - most enterprises run 
their own DNS servers as part of an Active Directory scheme. 
In any case, those workstations belong to the enterprise and 
they can point them to whatever DNS servers they want. 

For most end-users, their Internet access provider already 
selects their DNS caching server. ISPs are within their 
rights to do this - I'm surprised most broadband ISPs haven't 
done exactly what OpenDNS is doing to generate revenue.

I'm sure if you look really hard, you can find something else 
to be outraged about. OpenDNS isn't it. I'm at a loss to 
explain why people are trying so hard to condemn something like this. 

- Daniel Golding

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] 
On Behalf 
Of Stephane Bortzmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:09 AM
To: Steve Sobol
Cc: Joseph Jackson; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Sitefinder II, the sequel...


On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:19:51PM -0700,  Steve Sobol 
<sjsobol () JustThe net> wrote  a message of 16 lines which said:

There's a big difference, of course, between 
INTENTIONALLY pointing 
your computers at DNS servers that do this kind of thing, 
and having 
it done for you without your knowledge and/or consent.

As Steven Bellovin pointed out, most OpenDNS users will not 
choose it:
it will be choosen for them by their corporate IT department or by 
their Internet access provider.





Current thread: