nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:14:03 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:
Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF. Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?
Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?
Current thread:
- Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Jerry Pasker (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Rob Thomas (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 John Kristoff (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 10)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Joe Abley (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 10)
- RE: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 WONG, Yuen-Fung (Jul 12)
- RE: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 12)