nanog mailing list archives
Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching
From: Vicky Røde <vickyr () socal rr com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:03:33 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hmm..I thought (correct me if I wrong) wsus followed a mirror (distributed) model say if a group of servers were pegged the update process would provide remote clients access to the closet and min latency host(s) in order to distribute the load prevent bandwidth saturation. regards, /virendra Elijah Savage wrote:
Sean Donelan wrote:So, maybe an operational question. What are people seeing as far as network traffic loads due to WMF patching activity, e.g. auto-update and manual downloads? Microsoft has used several CDNs in addition to its own servers to distribute the load in the past.WSUS servers are being pounded right now. Usually 5 to 7% CPU now 72%
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDvqLlpbZvCIJx1bcRAoF4AJ9pi/xlNkX8mSMT4ogZcVccrJ9ijACg854X JhwaWYg6bEmVf4yHVmY6mQI= =3oZt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Sean Donelan (Jan 05)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Gadi Evron (Jan 05)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Elijah Savage (Jan 05)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Gadi Evron (Jan 05)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Vicky Røde (Jan 06)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Elijah Savage (Jan 06)
- Re: net-op: traffic loads as the result of patching Martin Hannigan (Jan 07)