nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS vs PTP
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:56:46 +0000
it seems to me that a correctly configured, directly connected pipe would work as well as mpls, with the benefit of local control of my
routers
and owning any incompetence.
I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone... Is it possible that IP on a plain old PDH circuit could really work as well as IP over MPLS over SDH over DWDM over fibre?
Current thread:
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?, (continued)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Joe Abley (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? bmanning (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Stephen Sprunk (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 30)
- MPLS vs PTP Andrew Staples (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Jon Lewis (Jan 30)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael . Dillon (Jan 31)
- RE: MPLS vs PTP Neil J. McRae (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP Michael Loftis (Jan 31)
- Re: MPLS vs PTP John Curran (Jan 31)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Joe Abley (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 30)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Todd Underwood (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Michael . Dillon (Jan 27)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 28)