nanog mailing list archives
Re: preventing future situations like panix
From: Josh Karlin <karlinjf () cs unm edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:42:01 -0700
To what extent does the route object validation in the RIPE database (for routes covering RIPE-allocated space), together with maintainer object authentication, provide a "perfect IRR", according to your research? (I realise the step from "useful, authenticated source of data" to "universally-deployed import filters" is non-trivial.)
My understanding is that RIPE, while quite good, still contains a significant amount of old data that needs to be regularly flushed. It certainly seems reasonable to use its information as a good first approximation of the validity of a route, and I think that would go quite well with our recommendation, reducing the number of routes flagged as suspicious.
Current thread:
- preventing future situations like panix Josh Karlin (Jan 23)
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Bill Woodcock (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Bill Woodcock (Jan 23)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Josh Karlin (Jan 23)
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Bill Woodcock (Jan 23)
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Josh Karlin (Jan 23)
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Josh Karlin (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: preventing future situations like panix Todd Underwood (Jan 23)