nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:28:51 -0700
--On February 28, 2006 5:15:37 PM -0500 John Payne <john () sackheads org> wrote:
On Feb 28, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:Should be doable with a DNS SRV record like mechanism. Don't worry too much about this one.Where does the assumption that the network operators control the DNS for the end hosts come from?
Thin air I think. Certainly isn't the case with a large number of domains we host.
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne), (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) John Payne (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kevin Day (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Daniel Golding (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Christian Kuhtz (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Joe Abley (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kevin Day (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Michael Loftis (Feb 28)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) Kevin Day (Feb 28)