nanog mailing list archives
Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...]
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:27:52 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
If you're near real time, you have lots of options actually. And I would contend that p2p can be efficient for broadcast distribution actually. There already are several startups doing exactly that for large scalability.
Yep. Lots of startups have lots of ideas. If you are selling hammers, you can use the same hammer for lots of projects. But I'm not a true believer in the hammer religion.
No actual end user (other than the geek crowd) will ever care that it's BitTorrent or whatever. Agreed. But that doesn't mean a bastardization of the idea won't run underneath.
I'm a terrible forecaster. I have no idea how the future will turn out. Sometimes there are several ways to solve a problem.
Current thread:
- Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Scott Weeks (Feb 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Bora Akyol (Feb 06)
- Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Christian Kuhtz (Feb 06)
- RE: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Sean Donelan (Feb 06)
- Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Christian Kuhtz (Feb 06)
- Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Sean Donelan (Feb 07)
- Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] Christian Kuhtz (Feb 07)